01Work scene
Requirements and PRD crosses product, design and engineering, where missed constraints quickly become rework. The working boundary must also account for hand-offs with User stories and acceptance criteria and Solution and architecture review.
02How AI assists
AI can structure constraints, draft alternatives and expose inconsistencies around Requirements and PRD. Use User stories and acceptance criteria and Solution and architecture review as adjacent reference points when checking inputs and outputs.
03Human responsibility
Product, design and engineering specialists approve the feasibility, safety and acceptance criteria for Requirements and PRD. The owner confirms where responsibility passes to or from User stories and acceptance criteria and Solution and architecture review.
04Smallest pilot
Apply Requirements and PRD to one real, tightly bounded requirement. Include one documented hand-off with User stories and acceptance criteria and Solution and architecture review in the bounded pilot.
05Workflow
Freeze inputs → AI assists Requirements and PRD → expert review → revise → verify and version. Before closure, verify the boundary against User stories and acceptance criteria and Solution and architecture review.
06Measurable result
Track Requirements and PRD review time, missing requirements and avoidable rework. Also observe whether hand-offs involving User stories and acceptance criteria and Solution and architecture review are complete and reviewable.
07Risk boundary
Requirements and PRD never bypasses expert review, engineering proof, intellectual-property checks or safety gates. These references to User stories and acceptance criteria and Solution and architecture review describe adjacent work only, not an existing integration or deployment.