01Work scene
User stories and acceptance criteria crosses product, design and engineering, where missed constraints quickly become rework. The working boundary must also account for hand-offs with Requirements and PRD and Solution and architecture review.
02How AI assists
AI can structure constraints, draft alternatives and expose inconsistencies around User stories and acceptance criteria. Use Requirements and PRD and Solution and architecture review as adjacent reference points when checking inputs and outputs.
03Human responsibility
Product, design and engineering specialists approve the feasibility, safety and acceptance criteria for User stories and acceptance criteria. The owner confirms where responsibility passes to or from Requirements and PRD and Solution and architecture review.
04Smallest pilot
Apply User stories and acceptance criteria to one real, tightly bounded requirement. Include one documented hand-off with Requirements and PRD and Solution and architecture review in the bounded pilot.
05Workflow
Freeze inputs → AI assists User stories and acceptance criteria → expert review → revise → verify and version. Before closure, verify the boundary against Requirements and PRD and Solution and architecture review.
06Measurable result
Track User stories and acceptance criteria review time, missing requirements and avoidable rework. Also observe whether hand-offs involving Requirements and PRD and Solution and architecture review are complete and reviewable.
07Risk boundary
User stories and acceptance criteria never bypasses expert review, engineering proof, intellectual-property checks or safety gates. These references to Requirements and PRD and Solution and architecture review describe adjacent work only, not an existing integration or deployment.